Image source: Wikipedia
The FBI soon could
get the power to hack any computer, anywhere thanks to a new under-the-radar US
Supreme Court decision.
A slight change to
what is known as Rule 41 makes it easier than ever for Uncle Sam to do an
end-run around the Fourth Amendment.
“Under the proposed
rules, the government would now be able to obtain a single warrant to access
and search thousands or millions of computers at once; and the vast majority of
the affected computers would belong to the victims, not the perpetrators, of a
cybercrime,” US Senator Ron Wyden (D-Oregon)
said of the action in a press release. “This is really a big issue when you’re
talking about expanding the government’s hacking and surveillance authority.”
The Supreme Court
approved the tweak to Rule 41 — part of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
– late last month. The changes would allow a federal judge to issue a warrant
authorizing the FBI agency to hack into a computer or smartphone anywhere in the
US.
Under the current
rules, federal judges and magistrates generally can only issue warrants within
their jurisdiction. Under the new rules, a federal judge in New York could
issue a warrant for an agent to hack into a computer in California.
The ruling by the
Supreme Court came not in a typical court case but as part of the judge’s
annual overview of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, The Atlantic reported.
“These are complex
issues involving privacy, digital security and our Fourth Amendment rights,
which require thoughtful debate and public vetting,” Wyden complained.
The senator accused
the court of making law by proposing the change. The new rule will go into
effect December 1 unless Congress overturns it.
“Substantive policy
changes like these are clearly a job for Congress, the American people and
their elected representatives, not an obscure bureaucratic process,” Wyden
said.
Google, the American
Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation had written a
letter to the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules,
opposing the proposed change, Newsweek reported.
Google argued the change would be a “substantive expansion” of the government’s
search capabilities and would “authorize remote searches of millions of
computers.” Significantly, the new rule allows the FBI to search any computer
that is damaged or infected with malware, which one estimate placed at about 30
percent of all computers nationwide, Google claimed.
“[This] raises a
number of monumental and highly complex constitutional, legal, and geopolitical
concerns that should be left to Congress to decide,” Google wrote.
This article
discusses the new law giving authority to the FBI all over the United States.
This article was clearly biased only giving the viewpoint of the reasons that
this is a bad idea. I found it interesting that Google participated in this
debate voting against this new law. I think there are very sensitive issues
surrounding this law. I understand that this could help the government find
criminals but it also violates the privacy of its citizens. This is a difficult situation. I found it
interesting that it was mentioned that this was a place for Congress to decide.
This leads to the thought that it was a different governing body that made this
decision. I find this interesting that such a controversial thing could be
decided by a lesser authority.
No comments:
Post a Comment